|
Whether you're identifying areas of excellence or targeting improvement
opportunities, National Comparatives from CareScience can enhance your clinical
process improvement efforts. A complement to the Quality Manager,
National Comparatives allows users to compare clinical and financial outcomes
and resource use patterns across DRG, diagnosis, procedure, and other parameters.
These resource-level comparisons provide valuable insight into practice variations
between your facility and national benchmarks.
With the Quality Manager, users can access and analyze detailed information
about their facility, physicians, patient care processes, resources and outcomes.
The National Comparatives module enhances this clinical analysis with the capability
to conduct comparative benchmarking for outcomes and resource use against a national
database. Together, the full suite gives physician managers and clinicians insights
to identify areas of excellence, opportunities for improvement, and optimum treatment
protocols.
National Comparatives offers the following benefits and features:
|
|
|
A National Dataset for Benchmarking - This dataset is compiled from
CareScience clients nationwide (data is generated from more than one and a
half million patient encounters captured in the Quality Manager and
is growing every day).
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-Adjusted Data for Enhanced Accuracy - The National Comparatives
database uses CareScience's unique, risk-assessment methodologies to account
for variations in outcomes due to patient demographics, clinical details, and
care selection factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Standardization of Resource Terms for Quick and Easy Analysis - All resource
data has been standardized using the CareScience Clinical Terminology Service
( based on the National Library of Medicine's widely accepted Unified Medical
Language System) to allow for meaningful, accurate comparisons across multiple
facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Flexible Query Tool and Customized Reporting - A flexible query tool
to accommodate very specific, user-defined clinical analyses. Users can easily
customize the patient populations studied to include DRGs, diagnoses, procedures,
and/or specific resource use.
|
|
|